Ze’ev Jabotinsky — 1880-1940 — was a giant in Zionist history, standing for the sort of proud Jewish integrity that kept us strong.
He came out of Russia at the beginning of the 20th century as a journalist, who ultimately achieved much acclaim for his writing. The pogroms of Kishnev spurred him to organize Jewish self-defense units and to participate in the sixth Zionist Congress. He promoted the use of Hebrew and the establishment of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
During WWI, he was instrumental in forming a Jewish Legion. After the war he became a member of the Zionist Executive and a founder of Keren Haysod. Taking issue with the policies of the Zionist Movement, he established the Revisionist Zionist Alliance, which promoted immediate founding of a Jewish state. Within the Revisionist movement developed the Betar youth movement, which taught young people nationalism; the Irgun, the military arm of the movement; and the New Zionist Movement, the political arm. It was the Revisionists who promoted illegal Jewish immigration into Palestine after the British blocked it.
Once Israel was founded, well after Jabotinsky’s death, the Revisionist Movement melded into Herut, which was a precursor to today’s Likud party.
Jabotinsky, who has been described as “both a visionary and a warrior,” made immeasurable contributions to the Jewish state.
I have thought over the years that he has been much neglected, and I have wondered how many really know about him any more. Thus it gives me pleasure to have this opportunity to write about him.
And the opportunity? Seems Jabotinsky has a name-sake grandson, Ze’ev Jabotinsky, who, just hours ago, stood with Binyamin Netanyahu at Likud headquarters in Tel Aviv to announce that he would be running in the Likud primary next month.
Netanyahu, elated and excited, said:
“Things have come full circle. It is a privilege for the Likud to have such a man in its ranks.”
“I admit I’m excited. It’s a privilege to join the movement. The last time Jabotinsky [his grandfather], Begin [Benny’s father, Menachem] and Netanyahu [Binyamin’s father, Benzion, still alive at 93] served the Jewish public was in World War II, when they tried to save Europe’s Jews from annihilation. Today we are a team again and we want to do everything we can to meet the challenges Israel is facing.”
Arutz Sheva cited Jabotinsky as having said in a Yediot Ahronot interview that Oslo made things “500 times worse.”
A “Palestinian” state, he said, “would be the base for the international terror of Al Qaeda and Hezbollah with Iranian funding. If they opt for that we will reach a situation in which instead of 1,400 [Jewish] dead there will be 30,000 dead. They will not hesitate to use chemical weapons against us.”
And how about this, as well: Yaakov Turkel, who served as a justice on Israel’s High Court for ten years, until 2005, has given an interview to Arutz Sheva in which he says that the High Court did NOT order the eviction of the residents of Beit HaShalom in Hevron. Rather, the court put it in the hands of the State and gave authorities the freedom to decide whether or not to evict — it said the State MAY evict.
“When the Defense Minister said he would abide by the Supreme Court ruling ordering the Jews’ eviction,” Turkel said, “this was very much not to my liking, since there was no such order… This misunderstanding has caused the great rift in the religious and right-wing’s trust in the Supreme Court.”
The question, I would say, is whether Barak knew full well that he didn’t have to proceed with eviction but opted to put the onus on the court.
The article cites Public Security Minister Avi Dichter (Kadima) who said last week:
“The ruling is not a recommendation, and we will implement it exactly as written [saying in 30 days no Jews would be living in the building]. We have no intention of straying from the Supreme Court ruling, which is the law.”
Arutz Sheva suggests that Dichter must not have read the ruling.
I will follow up on this. Justice Turkel puts much of the responsibility for the misunderstanding on the media, which comes as no surprise — the media is in the main anti-“settler.” But why were there no lawyers in the past days who raised this issue? It does change matters.
As to Hevron, some 20,000 visitors were estimated to have been in the Jewish Quarter of the city over Shabbat because of the Torah portion. Some have remained because of the political situation.
There were a handful of incidents, involving youngsters from the outside, but for the most part things were peaceful.
There was a report today that officers in the IDF Central Command were worried that when Barak give orders to evacuate Beit HaShalom soldiers and police who live past the Green Line (and figure they may be next) or those with a nationalist orientation may refuse to participate.